Show 25 25 50 All.
My uniform might not be what I would wear in my own time, but it gives me a sense of belonging, takes away the pressure of what to wear and deters the bullies. Topics Students Blogging students. Higher education Sixth form Schools Colleges Further education blogposts.
Order by newest oldest recommendations. Show 25 25 50 All. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. Loading comments… Trouble loading? Teenage boys wear skirts to school to protest against 'no shorts' policy.
Dozens of pupils at Isca academy in Exeter stage uniform protest after school insists they wear trousers despite heatwave. Kent school head defends sending home girls in too-short skirts. Parents of pupils at Ebbsfleet academy can have them educated elsewhere if they object to the uniform rules, says principal. Should we cut our ties to school uniforms? After a rigorous headteacher sent 80 pupils home for uniform violations this week, we asked parents, pupils and professionals if the right clothes really make a difference.
School uniform frees girls from pressures. Headteacher vows to continue 'zero-tolerance' uniform crackdown. Police called after school sends dozens of pupils home for wearing wrong uniform. There are an abundance of theories and empirical studies looking at school uniforms, making statements about their effectiveness.
These theories and studies elaborate on the benefits and also the shortcomings of uniform policies. The issue of nature vs. With uniforms also comes a variety of controversies, pros, cons and major legal implications. There are two main empirical findings that are most often cited in the political rhetoric surrounding the uniform debate.
One of these, the case study of the Long Beach Unified School District , is most often cited in support of school uniforms and their effectiveness whereas Effects of Student Uniforms on Attendance, Behavior Problems, Substance Use, and Academic Achievement is the most frequently cited research in opposition to the implementation of school uniform policies.
The case study of the Long Beach Unified School District was the study of the first large, urban school in the United States to implement a uniform policy. In , mandatory school uniforms were implemented for the districts elementary and middle schools as a strategy to address the students' behaviour issues.
The study attributed favourable student behavioral changes and a significant drop in school discipline issues  to the mandatory uniform policy. This case study attributed the following noticeable outcomes to the use of uniforms throughout the district:.
Other research found that uniforms were not an effective deterrent to decrease truancy, did not decrease behavior problems, decrease substance use, or increase student achievement.
A study suggested that "instead of directly affecting specific outcomes, uniforms act as a catalyst for change and provide a highly visible opportunity for additional programs" within schools.
In fact, Brunsma et al. Brunsma stated that despite the inconclusiveness of the effects of uniforms, they became more common because "this is an issue of children's rights, of social control, and one related to increasing racial, class and gender inequalities in our schools.
As uniforms have become more normalised, there have also been an increasing number of lawsuits brought against school districts. According to David Brunsma, one in four public elementary schools and one in eight public middle and high schools in the USA have policies dictating what a student wears to school.
As of , there are currently 23 states that allow school districts to mandate school uniforms. Although up until this point, The Supreme Court has not ruled on a case involving school uniforms directly, in the decision Tinker v.
Des Moines Independent Community School District , the Court ruled that upon entering school, students do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech. Internationally, there are differing views of school uniforms. In the Australian state of Queensland, Ombudsman Fred Albietz ruled in that state schools may not require uniforms.
In Scotland, some local councils that have responsibility for delivering state education do not insist on students wearing a uniform as a precondition to attending and taking part in curricular activities. In the Canady v. Bossier Parish School Board lawsuit in , a Louisiana district court ruled in favour of the school board because it did not see how the free speech rights of the students were being violated due to the school board's uniform policy.
Even though the plaintiff appealed the decision, the Fifth Circuit Court also ruled in favour of the school board after implementing a four-step system that is still used today. Firstly, a school board has to have the right to set up a policy. Secondly, the policy must be determined to support a fundamental interest of the board as a whole.
Thirdly, the guidelines cannot have been set for the purpose of censorship. Finally, the limits on student expression cannot be greater than the interest of the board. As long as these four policies are in place, then no constitutional violation can be claimed. In the Forney Independent School District of Forney, Texas in , the school board decided to implement a school uniform policy allowing the students to wear a polo shirt , oxford shirt or blouse in four possible colours, and blue or khaki pants or shirts, a skirt or jumper.
While there was some flexibility with shoes, certain types were prohibited along with any sort of baggy clothes. The parents of the Littlefield family requested that their son be exempt from the policy, but were denied. In response, the Littlefields filed a lawsuit against the school district, under the pretenses that this uniform mandate infringed on their rights as parents to control how they brought up their children and their education.
They even went as far as to cite an infringement on religious freedom, claiming that opting out of the uniforms on the grounds of religion allowed the school to rank the validity of certain religions.
Before trial, the District Court dismissed the case, so the family appealed. Ultimately, the Fifth Circuit Court ruled that the students' rights were not being violated even though the claims presented were valid. They ruled that school rules derived from the education would override the parents' right to control their children's upbringing in this specific situation. As far as the religious freedom violation accusations, the court ruled that the policy did not have a religious goal, and thus did not infringe on religious freedom rights.
In , Liberty High School, a school of the Clark County School District in Henderson, Nevada , implemented a uniform policy of khakis and red, white or blue polo shirts. A junior by the name of Kimberly Jacobs was suspended a total of five times because she wore a religious shirt to school and got cited for uniform violations. Her family sued the Clark County School District under the claims that her First Amendment rights were being infringed upon and that the uniform policy was causing students to be deprived of due process.
The plaintiff's requests were for injunctive relief, the expunging of suspensions from Jacob's school record and awarding of damages. The injunction was granted to the family meaning that the school could no longer discipline her for breaking the uniform policy.
At this ruling, the school district appealed. The next court ruled on the side of the school district as it determined that the uniform policy was in fact neutral and constitutional, and it dismissed the claims of the plaintiff. In , a Nevada public elementary school of the Washoe County School District decided to add the school's motto, Tomorrow's Leaders embroidered in small letters on the shirt.
In response, Mary and John Frudden, parents of a student sued the school district on the basis of it violating the 1st Amendment. The court ultimately dismissed the case filed by the Fruddens over the uniforms. However, the family appealed, and two years later, a three-judge panel of the 9th U. Circuit Court of Appeals heard the case. The court ruled to reverse the previous decision of dismissing the case, and also questioned the apparent policy for students that were part of a nationally recognised group such as Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts who were able to wear the uniforms in place of the school ones on regular meeting days.
The 9th circuit panel ruled that the school had not provided enough evidence for why it instituted this policy, and that the family was never given a chance to argue. There are several positive and negative social implications of uniforms on both the students wearing them and society as a whole. One of the criticisms of uniforms is that it imposes standards of masculinity and femininity from a young age.
Uniforms are considered a form of discipline that schools use to control student behavior and often promote conventional gendered dress. They are also often required to have their hair cut short. Some critics allege that this uniform is associated with the dress of a professional business man, which, they claim, gives boys at a young age the impression that masculinity is gained through business success.
Skirts are seen by some critics as a symbol of femininity because they restrict movement and force certain ways of sitting and playing. Uniforms often start to increase in popularity around middle school in the United States , when students begin going through puberty.
Uniforms can be seen as a way to restrict the sexualization of girls rules on hems of skirts, no shoulders. Uniforms take the focus away from sexuality and focus it on academics in a school setting for girls. Miniskirts have been very popular in Japan, where they became part of school uniforms, and they came to be worn within the Kogal culture. In some cultures, the topic of school uniforms has sparked a multitude of controversies and debates over the years.
In the United States, the implementation of school uniforms began following ten years of research indicating the effectiveness of private schools. Some state-school reformers cited this research to support policies linked to private and Catholic school success.
However, within the Catholic school literature, school uniforms have never been acknowledged as a primary factor in producing a Catholic school effect. This is based on the assumption that uniforms are the direct cause of behavioral and academic outcome changes. Another area of controversy regarding school uniform and dress code policies revolve around the issue of gender.
Nowadays, more teenagers are more frequently "dressing to articulate, or confound gender identity and sexual orientation ", which brings about "responses from school officials that ranged from indifferences to applause to bans". Instances include the following:
Traditionally favored by private and parochial institutions, school uniforms are being adopted by US public schools in increasing numbers. One in five US public schools required students to wear uniforms during the school year, up from one in eight in Wearing a uniform is a badge of pride, creates an identity for a school and is an important part of being a school student. “Uniforms show that you are part of an organisation. Shop French Toast for the latest school uniforms for girls and boys including skirts, polos, pants, and accessories. A+ in style and savings!